Outcomes of the Community Discovered Sustainability Meetings
Purpose and Background: The following is a summary of the outcomes of the sustainability meetings conducted by the Community Discovered Project during the Summer and Fall of 1997. The meetings were to identify and agree upon a set of common beliefs about the guiding principles and desired outcomes of the project &endash; and to identify strategies for ensuring sustainability and scaleability. The overarching goal for this process was to gain a reaffirmation, among all project partners, to continue collaboration and support for this important initiative based on a shared set of beliefs and strategies for the future.
The Desired Outcomes: In identifying the desired outcomes of the participation in the project by key partners, the following impact statements were developed within the sustainability meetings.
Students will:
Teachers will:
Cultural Institutions will:
Higher Education Institutions will:
Business Partners will:
Parents and the Larger Community will:
The Nebraska Department of Education will:
The Belief Statements:
In identifying the shared beliefs of partners in the project, the following belief statements were developed within the meetings. These belief statements will be used to help guide the project in all project developed activities and general planning.
a) We believe that to teach and learn through the visual and performing arts:
b) We believe that to teach and learn from an interdisciplinary approach, educators should be encouraged to:
c) We believe that to teach and learn from a constructivist framework means:
d) We believe that teaching and learning through the application and integration of technology:
The Tools and Resources for Sustainability:
The meetings also identified five different categories of tools and resources to aid in the sustainability process, which were acknowledged by the participants:
1. Mixes of Community-based Partners
2. Well-defined Roles and Responsibilities of Partners
3. Teacher and Administrator Empowerments
4. Professional Development for All Partners
5. Interactive Communications Opportunities
For additional information:
For additional information related to this report, or the Community Discovered Project itself and the Office of Internet Studies, related to the evaluation process, the following two web sites will be useful.
The Community Discovered: http://communitydisc.wst.esu3.k12.ne.us
The Office of Internet Studies: http://ois.unomaha.edu
At the conclusion of the Community Discovered project's advisory
board meeting (April, 1997), it became evident that further
opportunities to reflect upon and evaluate project accomplishments,
strengths, obstacles, and critical success factors for the future
would be beneficial. The project director then worked with the
evaluation team and an external facilitator to plan a series of
invited meetings for representatives from among each
participant/partner group (e.g. teachers, arts and cultural
institutions, site coordinators, K-12 and higher education
administrators, business representatives, etc.) to meet this
expressed need.
The meetings were approached from a constructivist context - to
identify and agree upon a set of common beliefs about the guiding
principles and desired outcomes of the project - and to identify
strategies for ensuring sustainability and scaleability befitting a
national challenge grant program. The overarching goal for this
process was to gain a reaffirmation, among all project partners, to
continue collaboration and support for this important initiative
based on a shared set of beliefs and strategies for the future.
Developing Specifications for Success
In preparation for the meeting, project administrators, evaluation
team members and the external facilitator reviewed and assessed
feedback regarding Year One activities from among advisory team
members, other project partners, and school-based participants. In
addition to input collected during the spring advisory meeting, this
also included online comments and belief statements which teachers
were requested to contribute to the Community Discovered Web
site.
As a result of this assessment, three needs and attendant goals
were identified for the series of meetings. First, it was affirmed
that all project partners and participants need to reach consensus on
a common set of beliefs regarding the four major components of the
Community Discovered initiative (i.e. the visual and performing arts
as a core subject area, the integration of the arts within
interdisciplinary curricular approaches, the constructivist framework
for teaching and learning, and the integration of technology with
arts-based content and practice). A goal was thus established for
participants to develop and agree upon a set of belief statements for
each of the above-mentioned components.
Second, there appeared to be a need to clarify and provide some
guidance regarding the expectations, role and responsibilities of key
project partners and participants (i.e. museums, other arts centers,
businesses, school administrators, teachers). This would again
require consensus about anticipated outcomes among the above players
as well as students, parents, and the community at large. Once
outcomes were defined, the participants would need to address
strategies for working together to achieve this.
Finally, in response to a key project goal, the challenge of
sustainability and scaleability needed to be addressed. Participants
would be asked to develop strategies for documenting and sharing
project accomplishments and processes that would be helpful to
colleagues in Nebraska and nationally. In addition, further
strategies should be defined for ensuring long-term growth and
support for the Community Discovered initiative.
Constructing the Plan
Meeting #1
The initial meeting (July 24) was limited to a small group of
individuals representing a cross-section of partners as well as
issues addressed by the project. In addition to Community Discovered
staff and evaluation team members, the group included representatives
from a museum partner, school district, the state department of
education, and a scholar on constructivist learning. The external
facilitator developed the agenda and managed the meeting with the
assistance of the project director and a member of the evaluation
team (who also served as a co-facilitator for key discussion period
during both meetings).
All participants were sent a packet of articles which they were
asked to read in advance of the meeting. The readings included
journal articles and other writings that pertained to one or more of
key project components and issues.
The agenda included a warm-up exercise during which each
participant was randomly provided the name of an arts modality (e.g.
modern dance, symphony, opera, theater, etc.) and asked to use it as
a metaphor to describe his/her role in the Community Discovered
project. Following a presentation of meeting goals and objectives by
the facilitator, the project director and lead evaluator provided a
brief status report regarding project accomplishments and evaluation
activities.
Pre-assigned groups then worked together to draft an initial set
of belief statements about one of the four key project cornerstones
(i.e. the arts as core, interdisciplinary approach, constructivist
framework, integration of arts and technology). The groups were asked
to draw upon the readings, as well as their own knowledge and
experience with the project. Each group then presented their draft
statements and received further suggestions from the larger group -
the results of which were typed and distributed to all participants
over the lunch break.
The afternoon was devoted to the identification of issues and
challenges in ensuring that project activities would embrace the
aforementioned beliefs - and to the development of strategies for
partners and participants to meet such challenges. Participants were
divided into two groups for the afternoon session and were asked to
report back using a graphical representation to summarize their
discussion.
At the conclusion of the July 24 meeting, participants indicated
that the meeting had been productive and met its goals. They
recommended that a similar agenda be constructed for a second meeting
to include representatives from all key partner groups.
Meeting #2
The second meeting (September 5) included teachers, administrators
and site coordinators from participating schools, as well as museum
and other cultural partners, business partners, university
administrators, and project staff and evaluators. As a warm-up
activity for this meeting, participants were asked to divide
themselves into groups (about six persons in each) and create a
multi-media mural representing the meaning of "community" as related
to the "Community Discovered" project. Each group then presented its
work to the larger group. The murals emphasized diversity,
interconnectedness, and the capabilities of communities to build upon
their unique strengths and resources.
The ArtsEdTech videotape was shown prior to small group break-out
sessions to further develop and refine the belief statements drafted
from the July 24 meeting. The videotape, developed in conjunction
with a national conference for leaders and resource people involved
with the arts, education and technology, provides examples of the
integration of technology for learning and teaching in, through, and
about the arts.
Four groups were pre-assigned to ensure that each included
representation from the key partners and participating schools. Each
group was asked to further develop and/or refine the draft belief
statements for one of the four cornerstones. Following the
report-backs to the larger groups, the revised belief statements were
typed and distributed to participants following the lunch break.
Prior to lunch, the project director and lead evaluator provided a
brief project status report as well as issues and challenges for the
group to address during the afternoon sessions. They indicated that
after 18 months, there is greater insight among all partners and
participants about the project's four cornerstones, and a solid
foundation for expanding partnerships and developing new resources. A
primary concern is sustainability of the project beyond the current
grant cycle, which will be completed in the year 2000.
The evaluator discussed a survey to be distributed to all partners
in September that would seek input regarding project sustainability
and scaleability. The evaluation team will be evaluating curriculum
units and the teachers who created them regarding their consistency
with the belief statements and objectives under the project's
cornerstones.
Each of the four groups were asked to devote the afternoon
break-out session to defining strategies that would respond to the
following questions: 1) What should be the results of the
participation of the key partners in this project in terms of impact
on: students, teachers, cultural institutions, higher education,
business partners; 2) What kinds of strategies should be in place to
accomplish the outcomes and expectations of all partners (i.e.
opportunities for professional development, collaborative planning,
interactive communications, reflection and evaluation); 3) How can we
best document and share the project accomplishments and lessons
learned (locally and nationally). This was followed by a large group
report-back session, during which the co-facilitators helped to
identify key conclusions and recommendations.
Finally, participants were asked to group themselves according to
similar job responsibility (e.g. teachers, museum staff, other arts
staff, school administrators, business professionals, etc.) and to
develop specific strategies that would comprise an action plan for
their future participation in the project (based upon the information
and recommendations presented earlier in this meeting).
A Blueprint for the Future
The meetings helped Community Discovered staff and evaluators gain
a clearer sense of accomplishment, needs, and steps to be taken in
order to ensure long-term success for the project. Core project
partners and participants have a clearer sense of respective role and
responsibilities and have reaffirmed their commitment to the
initiative. The conclusions and recommendations from the meetings are
presented below and should guide project planning for the future.
The Results
Response to question #1: What should be the results of the
participation of the key partners in this project in terms of impact
on -- students, teachers, cultural institutions, higher education,
business partners?
Students will:
Teachers will:
Cultural Institutions will:
Higher Education Institutions will:
Business Partners will:
Parents and the Larger Community will:
The Nebraska Department of Education will:
Constructing the Model
Response to question #2: What kinds of strategies should be in place to accomplish the outcomes and expectations of all partners (i.e. opportunities for professional development, collaborative planning, interactive communications, reflection and evaluation)?
DESIGN
This project represents a unique and challenging initiative that
focuses on innovation and specific approaches for transforming
teaching and learning that involves key stakeholders throughout the
community. It is important that all participants understand and agree
upon the following guiding principles and expectations of The
Community Discovered project.
The Community Discovered project was designed to transform K-12 education by
integrating the arts, technology, and community resources within a constructivist
framework
A set of belief statements was developed to further define each of the (above) project
cornerstones, as follows:
technology:
Collaboration is achieved only when participants:
TOOLS and RESOURCES
The success of the Community Discovered project depends upon the
active participation of a wide range of community-based partners and
their contribution of resources in support of project goals and
objectives. Human resources and particularly the empowerment of
individuals and organizations to fully participate in this type of
initiative are as important as equipment, supplies and other physical
resources.
2. Well-defined Role and Responsibilities of Partners
3. Empowerment
4. Professional Development for All Partners
5. Interactive Communications Opportunities
MAINTENANCE
Sustainability and scaleability of The Community Discovered
project will depend upon ongoing and effective evaluation of
accomplishments and impact, as well as successful strategies for
using this evidence to ensure long-term funding support.
Reflection and Evaluation
Funding Support
Showcasing the Model
Response to question #3: How can we best document and share the
project accomplishments and lessons learned (locally and
nationally)?
Participants suggested the following strategies:
Additional time should be spent (i.e. should be a major agenda
item for the next partners meeting) on how the project
accomplishments could best be documented and shared.
SUMMARY
There were many commonalties from among the meeting participants
regarding the above recommendations. The need for ongoing
collaboration and interactive communications was a predominant focus
of discussion and identified as critical success factors for the
project. All partners were grateful to be part of the dialogue and
willingly set aside the time to participate in the day-long meeting.
Partners indicated they would welcome additional opportunities to
collaborate and be part of problem solving sessions.
All agreed that everyone participating in The Community Discovered
project benefits from the visual and performing arts. The arts are at
the core of the project and should continue to be the driving force
in the "search for meaning" part of The Community Discovered
initiative.
Participants also identified the need to expand and enhance wide
ranging professional development opportunities for teachers and
partners, as well as distance learning opportunities and online
resources for students. Such opportunities should focus on making
connections through the constructivist approach; learning new
vocabulary, knowledge, and understanding related to the visual and
performing arts; and, becoming adept in accessing and using
technology-based tools and resources.
Participants emphasized the need to identify and pursue public
relations opportunities that exist within the project, including
opportunities to share project accomplishments locally and
nationally. Project staff and participants should document and
showcase innovative instructional strategies, tools and resources, as
well as the work of their students, not only to validate their
participation in the project, but as a means of celebrating their
achievement.
The overall benefits of the project will be reinforced through
ongoing evaluation and reflection that includes the identification of
areas where improvement is needed.
Finally, it is clearly evident that all partners want to continue
to develop a sense of identify and empowerment through continued
dialogue and interaction. It is in this way that the broader sense of
community and the search for meaning can be realized.