|
“Hello
Dolly” was the Webquest I chose to review.
It was a great example, almost overwhelming
because it was very extensive. The links went on
and on, but were very interesting.
It
was a good exercise to use the class rubric and
become familiar with it. The text was
grammatically correct. I only found one small
error. (Excellent on the rubric-10pts) It was
definitely ag related since it was about cloning
sheep and other animals. (Excellent-10pts.)
There
were not a lot of graphics, but the ones used
were interesting and appropriate. The text was
easy to read and all included links worked well.
(10 pts.) The Introduction did not clearly state
the problem based learning situation. Perhaps
students could have been informed at that point
that they would be attending a summit on
cloning. However, The Task was clearly stated in
a question in that section. (15 pts.)
All the links to resources worked well and were
appropriate. (Excellent-10pts.) The only link I
found that did not work was the homepage of the
author. He had a unique feature; however, a
guest book for people to sign who visited his
webpage. The Process was clearly outlined (10
pts.) and the Evaluation exemplified by a link
to a possible rubric. This made the students
very much aware of what was expected. (10 pts.)
I assume the project was completed on time (10
pts).
This
Webquest was very professionally done. It was
interesting reviewing the other Webquests, as
well, to see how different people presented the
project. They all used the basic components of
Introduction, Task, Process, etc., and yet there
were subtle differences. It was interesting.
Hello Dolly Total: 85/90 pts.
|
|